Beyond humanism

If Enlightenment humanism is itself a mode of “transcending” humanity, then it’s not surprising to see in modernity a reaction to this internal to immanence — that is, reactions that have no interest in affirming transcendence but are nonetheless responding to the pressures of humanism. So, Taylor suggests, this is not simply a binary debate between belief and unbelief; it is a triangular debate between (1) secular humanists, (2) neo-Nietzschean antihumanists, and (3) “those who acknowledge some good beyond life” (p. 636).—James K. A. Smith, How (Not) to Be Secular, 110 (emphasis original)