I have argued that the humanness of Jesus’ sinlessness makes him richly relevant for us. Jesus’ reliance on empowering grace is more plausible than relying on inherent deity because this explanation fits the New Testament accounts of his temptations and his practical value as the reasonable pattern for others (with his full, credible empathy). Because Jesus has redeemed his people from slavery to sin and sent them the Holy Spirit, believers stand in nearly the same relation to temptation as Jesus had with the same empowering grace available to enable their faithful obedience to God. Thus, the empowering grace that was effective for his victories over temptation seems to be the same help of the Holy Spirit that is promised for believers. The Holy Spirit’s role in the hypostatic union enabled God the Son to enter temptation as a man because he was kept from knowing for certain he was immune to sin. God’s provision of aid for Jesus allowed him to experience temptation in a way that constituted him empathetic for others who must struggle in the same human terms that he did. The model of his life for others is as a peer, not merely as the ideal because he limited himself to the resources that God likewise makes available to Jesus’ followers. His empathy is credible because the transcendent security of his sinlessness was inevitable but not automatic. Jesus had to fight sin on the same basis that we do.—page 315
<idle musing>
The empowering presence of God via the Holy Spirit. Amazing, isn't it? We sell God so short and don't allow him to do all he wants in our lives.
</idle musing>
1 comment:
The more I see Jesus as a man operating under reliance on the Holy Spirit and grace rather than according to His deity, the more I seem to understand my own reliance on the Holy Spirit and grace.
"The words that I speak to you I do not speak on My own authority; but the Father who dwells in Me does the works."
Post a Comment