It's irreligious!

The crucifixion marks out the essential distinction between Christianity and “religion.” Religion as defined in these pages is either an organized system of belief or, alternatively, a loose collection of ideas and practices, projected out of humanity’s needs and wishes. The cross is “irreligious” because no human being individually or human beings collectively would have projected their hopes, wishes, longings, and needs onto a crucified man. In a PBS television series, The Christians (1981), a studiously impartial narrator said this: “Christianity is the only major religion to have as its central focus the suffering and degradation of its God. The crucifixion is so familiar to us, and so moving, that it is hard to realize how unusual it is as an image of God” (emphasis added [by Rutledge]). The description of the cross as “moving” is noteworthy, but not the point. We focus on the narrator’s (or screenwriter’s) perception of the wrenching unsuitability of a crucifixion as an object of faith. He has come closer than many Christians to understanding not only the abhorrent and irreligious nature of crucifixion as a method of execution but also the unlikelihood of it arising out of religious imagination.—Fleming Rutledge, The Crucifixion, 75 (emphasis original)